Next Upcoming Google+ Hangout: Tuesday, August 27 @ 7PM (CST) - To Participate CLICK HERE

Search For Topics/Content
« 3 DV and 2 IV. I also have (possibly) up to 5 covariates (demographic info, eg. age, education, ethnicity, etc.); Only 1 group. So what's the best test? (Bren) | Main | Data Analysis Question: When dealing with significance levels, should I use p < .001 or p < .05? Also, should it change between tests or stay consistent throughout my analyses? (Matt, Chicago, IL) »
Thursday
May202010

Data Analysis Question: Will removing your partial (or missing) data and doubling your complete data give you the same results as completing a multiple imputation on the data? (Matt, Chicago, IL)  

Great question! I get questions about missing data and how to deal with it all of the time. To your question, simply removing partial data and doubling your complete data points will not result in the same outcome as a multiple imputation. This is because a multiple imputation inserts random values (within the parameters of your data) into your dataset  to make sure that no bias occurs by the replaced values being present. By contrast, if a bias exists in the pattern of missing data of your original dataset, doubling the existing values will merely magnify this bias. Multiple imputation is widely considered to be the most bias-free method of dealing with missing data. Although it can be complex and time intensive, modern statistical software (such as SPSS and AMOS) offer "multiple imputation" features, which vastly simplify the process.

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>